Provenance
It separates proof from opinion
A fact backed by a message is stored differently from something a person only claimed. The difference is a field in the record, not a matter of wording.
AI memory for your company
CorpusGrid captures the decisions, findings and delays buried in the email and documents your teams already produce, along with the reasons behind them. Nobody has to write anything down. Ask in plain language, get an answer with its sources, and only what you’re cleared to see.
In one picture
Every day your company produces more than anyone could read. CorpusGrid keeps the part that matters, connects it, and hands it back as answers, as warnings, and as a short list of what needs you today.
01 Three teams, six weeks
4 kept · 3 ignored · 0 filed by hand
Nobody changes how they work.
02 One connected memory
Context
3 departments · 11 messages · linked to 2 other contexts
Not a folder. One story, told by three teams.
03 What comes back
Answers
“Why are C40 complaints up?” Three customers, three descriptions, one cause: batch 2602, built with the new fan.
4 sources
Warnings
Purchasing is about to order 5,000 more fans from the same supplier.
1 open order
Actions
Four things need you today. The most urgent: 1,200 units already in the field.
from 3 contexts
Lessons
Approving a new supplier’s part at its test limit has brought complaints every time.
4 contexts
A new employee knows what a fifteen‑year veteran knows.
Email, the documents attached to it, and the notes people write after a meeting. One department’s message becomes another department’s answer, and the record keeps the same fields whichever of the three it came from.
What you get
No one person could keep all of this in their head. CorpusGrid does, for every team at once.
01 · Answers
Ask in normal words, the way you would ask a colleague. You get the answer itself, with the messages it came from. If the record cannot answer, it says so instead of inventing one.
Why did C40 complaints jump in March?
It is one fault, described three ways. All three units come from batch 2602, the first built with the new fan supplier (Purchasing, 12 Feb). The new fan ran close to its heat limit in testing, and Production approved the batch anyway to make the ship date (19 Feb).
Drawn from
When nothing in the record supports an answer, CorpusGrid says so instead of producing one.
02 · Warnings
You do not have to know that a question exists. When new work starts to look like something that went wrong before, CorpusGrid tells you, and shows you the case it means.
Supplier
Order confirmed: 5,000 fans for the C40, shipping 2 May
This has happened before
All three C40 complaints in March came from units built with this supplier’s fan. The last time a new supplier’s part was approved at its test limit, it ended in a recall.
03 · Actions
Not a task list somebody typed in. CorpusGrid reads what is open across your work and puts the few things that need a person in front of you: this expires soon, these two answers disagree, nobody replied to this.
DecideC40 batch 2602Support
1,200 units from this batch are in the field. Three have already failed.
3 complaints · 1 file
CheckFan orderPurchasing
5,000 more fans from the same supplier ship on 2 May.
Confirmed today · 1 email
ReplyNorthwind complaintSupport
Northwind reported a shutdown six days ago. Nobody has replied.
Waiting 6 days
ReadHeat testProduction
Batch 2602 was approved at the heat limit. Nobody has reviewed that approval since.
Since 19 Feb · 1 decision
Nobody wrote this list. It came out of the record.
04 · Lessons
Most companies do keep lessons learned. Then they sit in a folder nobody opens again. Here they form from the record on their own, and each one is checked against the work in progress, so you hear about it when it applies.
When a new supplier’s part was approved at its test limit, complaints followed within six weeks, three times out of three.
3 contexts · 2022–2026
The same fault reached Support in different words. Closing tickets one by one hid the pattern for weeks.
4 contexts · 2024–2026
Batches held back until the part passed with margin had no returns from the field.
5 contexts · 2023–2026
Nobody held a workshop to write these.
The idea
A folder puts files in one place. A context records how they affect each other, and contexts are linked to each other too. That is how a delay at a supplier becomes a warning on a schedule nobody had connected to it.
Nobody has to feed it
Every system that needs maintenance stops being maintained. That is why the knowledge bases your company has tried are empty. Here there is no approval queue, no weekly review, and nobody whose job becomes keeping the system alive. When it gets something wrong, the person who noticed fixes it on the spot.
Why nothing else worked
Your company already wrote all of this down. It is spread across thousands of messages that nobody will ever open again.
Four months of discussion across three teams end up as one line in a contract.
The engineer who approved that exception is gone. The exception is still in force.
The two messages that explain the change never use the word you searched for.
Every conversation starts from zero, so the answers fit any company except yours.
For your AI
Models reason well and remember nothing. That is why their answers sound like they were written for somebody else’s company. CorpusGrid is the missing half: the long memory the model reads from.
A model on its own
What it can see
Its answer
“Overheating usually points to blocked vents, a hot room or a worn fan. Check where the unit is installed…”
True of every company. Useless to yours.
The same model, on CorpusGrid
What it can see
Its answer
“All three complaints come from batch 2602, the first built with the new fan supplier. On 19 February the fan ran close to its heat limit in testing, and the batch was approved anyway…”
Your history, not general knowledge.
The memory grows every week from mail that was going to be written anyway, so the gap between what your company knows and what it can answer keeps closing on its own.
Why it holds up
Three things that had to be decided at the start, because none of them can be added later.
Provenance
A fact backed by a message is stored differently from something a person only claimed. The difference is a field in the record, not a matter of wording.
Residency
On your own servers, if your data must not leave the building. If it may, on our own infrastructure in Europe and Türkiye.
Correction
Move an event, split a context that became two, merge two that were always one, merge a person who appears under two addresses.
A short demo first. Then let’s work out together how you could use it at your company.